Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpZ_

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Term_sub(Case(m, xi, n), s) → Frozen(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → Term_sub(m, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → Term_sub(n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → Case(Term_sub(m, s), xi, Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_app(m, n), s) → Term_app(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_pair(m, n), s) → Term_pair(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_inl(m), s) → Term_inl(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_inr(m), s) → Term_inr(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Id) → Term_var(x)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → m
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_sub(m, s), t) → Term_sub(m, Concat(s, t))
Sum_sub(xi, Id) → Sum_term_var(xi)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_constant(k)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Concat(Concat(s, t), u) → Concat(s, Concat(t, u))
Concat(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → Cons_usual(x, Term_sub(m, t), Concat(s, t))
Concat(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → Cons_sum(xi, k, Concat(s, t))
Concat(Id, s) → s

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Term_sub(Case(m, xi, n), s) → Frozen(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → Term_sub(m, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → Term_sub(n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → Case(Term_sub(m, s), xi, Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_app(m, n), s) → Term_app(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_pair(m, n), s) → Term_pair(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_inl(m), s) → Term_inl(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_inr(m), s) → Term_inr(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Id) → Term_var(x)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → m
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_sub(m, s), t) → Term_sub(m, Concat(s, t))
Sum_sub(xi, Id) → Sum_term_var(xi)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_constant(k)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Concat(Concat(s, t), u) → Concat(s, Concat(t, u))
Concat(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → Cons_usual(x, Term_sub(m, t), Concat(s, t))
Concat(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → Cons_sum(xi, k, Concat(s, t))
Concat(Id, s) → s

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONCAT(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)
TERM_SUB(Case(m, xi, n), s) → FROZEN(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), s)
SUM_SUB(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → SUM_SUB(xi, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), s)
CONCAT(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)
TERM_SUB(Term_inl(m), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_inr(m), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
CONCAT(Concat(s, t), u) → CONCAT(s, Concat(t, u))
TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)
FROZEN(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
SUM_SUB(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → SUM_SUB(xi, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
CONCAT(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → TERM_SUB(m, t)
TERM_SUB(Case(m, xi, n), s) → SUM_SUB(xi, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → TERM_SUB(m, Concat(s, t))
TERM_SUB(Term_pair(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
CONCAT(Concat(s, t), u) → CONCAT(t, u)
TERM_SUB(Term_app(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_app(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_pair(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Term_sub(Case(m, xi, n), s) → Frozen(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → Term_sub(m, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → Term_sub(n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → Case(Term_sub(m, s), xi, Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_app(m, n), s) → Term_app(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_pair(m, n), s) → Term_pair(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_inl(m), s) → Term_inl(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_inr(m), s) → Term_inr(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Id) → Term_var(x)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → m
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_sub(m, s), t) → Term_sub(m, Concat(s, t))
Sum_sub(xi, Id) → Sum_term_var(xi)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_constant(k)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Concat(Concat(s, t), u) → Concat(s, Concat(t, u))
Concat(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → Cons_usual(x, Term_sub(m, t), Concat(s, t))
Concat(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → Cons_sum(xi, k, Concat(s, t))
Concat(Id, s) → s

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONCAT(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)
TERM_SUB(Case(m, xi, n), s) → FROZEN(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), s)
SUM_SUB(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → SUM_SUB(xi, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), s)
CONCAT(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)
TERM_SUB(Term_inl(m), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_inr(m), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
CONCAT(Concat(s, t), u) → CONCAT(s, Concat(t, u))
TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)
FROZEN(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
SUM_SUB(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → SUM_SUB(xi, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
CONCAT(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → TERM_SUB(m, t)
TERM_SUB(Case(m, xi, n), s) → SUM_SUB(xi, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → TERM_SUB(m, Concat(s, t))
TERM_SUB(Term_pair(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
CONCAT(Concat(s, t), u) → CONCAT(t, u)
TERM_SUB(Term_app(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_app(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_pair(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Term_sub(Case(m, xi, n), s) → Frozen(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → Term_sub(m, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → Term_sub(n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → Case(Term_sub(m, s), xi, Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_app(m, n), s) → Term_app(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_pair(m, n), s) → Term_pair(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_inl(m), s) → Term_inl(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_inr(m), s) → Term_inr(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Id) → Term_var(x)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → m
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_sub(m, s), t) → Term_sub(m, Concat(s, t))
Sum_sub(xi, Id) → Sum_term_var(xi)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_constant(k)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Concat(Concat(s, t), u) → Concat(s, Concat(t, u))
Concat(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → Cons_usual(x, Term_sub(m, t), Concat(s, t))
Concat(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → Cons_sum(xi, k, Concat(s, t))
Concat(Id, s) → s

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 3 SCCs with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SUM_SUB(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → SUM_SUB(xi, s)
SUM_SUB(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → SUM_SUB(xi, s)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Term_sub(Case(m, xi, n), s) → Frozen(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → Term_sub(m, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → Term_sub(n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → Case(Term_sub(m, s), xi, Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_app(m, n), s) → Term_app(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_pair(m, n), s) → Term_pair(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_inl(m), s) → Term_inl(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_inr(m), s) → Term_inr(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Id) → Term_var(x)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → m
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_sub(m, s), t) → Term_sub(m, Concat(s, t))
Sum_sub(xi, Id) → Sum_term_var(xi)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_constant(k)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Concat(Concat(s, t), u) → Concat(s, Concat(t, u))
Concat(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → Cons_usual(x, Term_sub(m, t), Concat(s, t))
Concat(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → Cons_sum(xi, k, Concat(s, t))
Concat(Id, s) → s

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

SUM_SUB(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → SUM_SUB(xi, s)
SUM_SUB(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → SUM_SUB(xi, s)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(Cons_sum(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 4 + x_3
POL(Cons_usual(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 4 + (4)x_3
POL(SUM_SUB(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Term_sub(Case(m, xi, n), s) → Frozen(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → Term_sub(m, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → Term_sub(n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → Case(Term_sub(m, s), xi, Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_app(m, n), s) → Term_app(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_pair(m, n), s) → Term_pair(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_inl(m), s) → Term_inl(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_inr(m), s) → Term_inr(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Id) → Term_var(x)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → m
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_sub(m, s), t) → Term_sub(m, Concat(s, t))
Sum_sub(xi, Id) → Sum_term_var(xi)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_constant(k)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Concat(Concat(s, t), u) → Concat(s, Concat(t, u))
Concat(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → Cons_usual(x, Term_sub(m, t), Concat(s, t))
Concat(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → Cons_sum(xi, k, Concat(s, t))
Concat(Id, s) → s

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), s)
TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), s)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Term_sub(Case(m, xi, n), s) → Frozen(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → Term_sub(m, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → Term_sub(n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → Case(Term_sub(m, s), xi, Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_app(m, n), s) → Term_app(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_pair(m, n), s) → Term_pair(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_inl(m), s) → Term_inl(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_inr(m), s) → Term_inr(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Id) → Term_var(x)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → m
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_sub(m, s), t) → Term_sub(m, Concat(s, t))
Sum_sub(xi, Id) → Sum_term_var(xi)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_constant(k)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Concat(Concat(s, t), u) → Concat(s, Concat(t, u))
Concat(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → Cons_usual(x, Term_sub(m, t), Concat(s, t))
Concat(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → Cons_sum(xi, k, Concat(s, t))
Concat(Id, s) → s

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), s)
TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → TERM_SUB(Term_var(x), s)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(TERM_SUB(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_2
POL(Cons_sum(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 4 + x_3
POL(Term_var(x₁)) = 0
POL(Cons_usual(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 4 + (4)x_3

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Term_sub(Case(m, xi, n), s) → Frozen(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → Term_sub(m, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → Term_sub(n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → Case(Term_sub(m, s), xi, Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_app(m, n), s) → Term_app(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_pair(m, n), s) → Term_pair(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_inl(m), s) → Term_inl(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_inr(m), s) → Term_inr(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Id) → Term_var(x)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → m
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_sub(m, s), t) → Term_sub(m, Concat(s, t))
Sum_sub(xi, Id) → Sum_term_var(xi)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_constant(k)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Concat(Concat(s, t), u) → Concat(s, Concat(t, u))
Concat(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → Cons_usual(x, Term_sub(m, t), Concat(s, t))
Concat(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → Cons_sum(xi, k, Concat(s, t))
Concat(Id, s) → s

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONCAT(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)
TERM_SUB(Case(m, xi, n), s) → FROZEN(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
CONCAT(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)
TERM_SUB(Term_inl(m), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_inr(m), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)
CONCAT(Concat(s, t), u) → CONCAT(s, Concat(t, u))
FROZEN(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
CONCAT(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → TERM_SUB(m, t)
TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → TERM_SUB(m, Concat(s, t))
TERM_SUB(Term_pair(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_app(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
CONCAT(Concat(s, t), u) → CONCAT(t, u)
FROZEN(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_app(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_pair(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Term_sub(Case(m, xi, n), s) → Frozen(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → Term_sub(m, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → Term_sub(n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → Case(Term_sub(m, s), xi, Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_app(m, n), s) → Term_app(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_pair(m, n), s) → Term_pair(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_inl(m), s) → Term_inl(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_inr(m), s) → Term_inr(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Id) → Term_var(x)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → m
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_sub(m, s), t) → Term_sub(m, Concat(s, t))
Sum_sub(xi, Id) → Sum_term_var(xi)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_constant(k)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Concat(Concat(s, t), u) → Concat(s, Concat(t, u))
Concat(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → Cons_usual(x, Term_sub(m, t), Concat(s, t))
Concat(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → Cons_sum(xi, k, Concat(s, t))
Concat(Id, s) → s

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

CONCAT(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)
TERM_SUB(Term_inl(m), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_inr(m), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
CONCAT(Concat(s, t), u) → CONCAT(s, Concat(t, u))
TERM_SUB(Term_pair(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
CONCAT(Concat(s, t), u) → CONCAT(t, u)
TERM_SUB(Term_pair(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

TERM_SUB(Case(m, xi, n), s) → FROZEN(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
CONCAT(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)
TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)
FROZEN(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
CONCAT(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → TERM_SUB(m, t)
TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → TERM_SUB(m, Concat(s, t))
TERM_SUB(Term_app(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_app(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(FROZEN(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄)) = 4 + (3/2)x_1 + (5/2)x_3
POL(CONCAT(x₁, x₂)) = 4 + (1/4)x_1
POL(Sum_term_var(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(Term_sub(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1 + (1/4)x_2
POL(Left) = 4
POL(Id) = 9/4
POL(Term_inr(x₁)) = 3/2 + (4)x_1
POL(Concat(x₁, x₂)) = 1/2 + x_1 + (9/4)x_2
POL(Term_pair(x₁, x₂)) = 3/4 + (4)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(Frozen(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄)) = 3/2 + (4)x_1 + x_2 + (5/4)x_3 + (4)x_4
POL(Sum_sub(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1
POL(Term_app(x₁, x₂)) = (2)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(Term_inl(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(TERM_SUB(x₁, x₂)) = 4 + x_1
POL(Cons_sum(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 7/2 + x_1 + (2)x_2 + x_3
POL(Right) = 0
POL(Term_var(x₁)) = 5/4 + (4)x_1
POL(Cons_usual(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = (7/2)x_1 + (4)x_2 + x_3
POL(Sum_constant(x₁)) = 0
POL(Case(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = (4)x_1 + (4)x_3

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)
TERM_SUB(Case(m, xi, n), s) → FROZEN(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
CONCAT(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → TERM_SUB(m, t)
TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → TERM_SUB(m, Concat(s, t))
TERM_SUB(Term_app(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_app(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
CONCAT(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Term_sub(Case(m, xi, n), s) → Frozen(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → Term_sub(m, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → Term_sub(n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → Case(Term_sub(m, s), xi, Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_app(m, n), s) → Term_app(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_pair(m, n), s) → Term_pair(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_inl(m), s) → Term_inl(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_inr(m), s) → Term_inr(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Id) → Term_var(x)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → m
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_sub(m, s), t) → Term_sub(m, Concat(s, t))
Sum_sub(xi, Id) → Sum_term_var(xi)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_constant(k)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Concat(Concat(s, t), u) → Concat(s, Concat(t, u))
Concat(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → Cons_usual(x, Term_sub(m, t), Concat(s, t))
Concat(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → Cons_sum(xi, k, Concat(s, t))
Concat(Id, s) → s

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TERM_SUB(Case(m, xi, n), s) → FROZEN(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
CONCAT(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → TERM_SUB(m, t)
TERM_SUB(Term_app(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_app(m, n), s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
CONCAT(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)
FROZEN(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → TERM_SUB(m, Concat(s, t))
FROZEN(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(FROZEN(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄)) = (1/2)x_1 + x_3
POL(CONCAT(x₁, x₂)) = (1/4)x_1
POL(Sum_term_var(x₁)) = (2)x_1
POL(Term_sub(x₁, x₂)) = (2)x_1 + x_2
POL(Left) = 0
POL(Term_inr(x₁)) = 7/2 + (4)x_1
POL(Id) = 3/4
POL(Concat(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(Term_pair(x₁, x₂)) = 15/4 + (3/2)x_2
POL(Frozen(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄)) = 1/4 + (7/2)x_1 + (4)x_2 + (4)x_3 + (4)x_4
POL(Sum_sub(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(Term_app(x₁, x₂)) = 1/4 + (7/4)x_1 + (9/4)x_2
POL(TERM_SUB(x₁, x₂)) = (1/4)x_1
POL(Term_inl(x₁)) = 7/2 + (3/4)x_1
POL(Right) = 5/2
POL(Cons_sum(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 4 + (7/2)x_1 + (13/4)x_2 + (7/2)x_3
POL(Term_var(x₁)) = 1/4 + (7/4)x_1
POL(Cons_usual(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 3/4 + (7/2)x_1 + x_2 + (4)x_3
POL(Sum_constant(x₁)) = 0
POL(Case(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1/4 + (4)x_1 + (1/4)x_2 + (4)x_3

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → CONCAT(s, t)
FROZEN(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)
FROZEN(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → TERM_SUB(n, s)
TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → TERM_SUB(m, Concat(s, t))
FROZEN(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → TERM_SUB(m, s)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Term_sub(Case(m, xi, n), s) → Frozen(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → Term_sub(m, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → Term_sub(n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → Case(Term_sub(m, s), xi, Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_app(m, n), s) → Term_app(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_pair(m, n), s) → Term_pair(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_inl(m), s) → Term_inl(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_inr(m), s) → Term_inr(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Id) → Term_var(x)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → m
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_sub(m, s), t) → Term_sub(m, Concat(s, t))
Sum_sub(xi, Id) → Sum_term_var(xi)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_constant(k)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Concat(Concat(s, t), u) → Concat(s, Concat(t, u))
Concat(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → Cons_usual(x, Term_sub(m, t), Concat(s, t))
Concat(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → Cons_sum(xi, k, Concat(s, t))
Concat(Id, s) → s

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 5 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → TERM_SUB(m, Concat(s, t))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Term_sub(Case(m, xi, n), s) → Frozen(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → Term_sub(m, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → Term_sub(n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → Case(Term_sub(m, s), xi, Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_app(m, n), s) → Term_app(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_pair(m, n), s) → Term_pair(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_inl(m), s) → Term_inl(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_inr(m), s) → Term_inr(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Id) → Term_var(x)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → m
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_sub(m, s), t) → Term_sub(m, Concat(s, t))
Sum_sub(xi, Id) → Sum_term_var(xi)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_constant(k)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Concat(Concat(s, t), u) → Concat(s, Concat(t, u))
Concat(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → Cons_usual(x, Term_sub(m, t), Concat(s, t))
Concat(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → Cons_sum(xi, k, Concat(s, t))
Concat(Id, s) → s

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TERM_SUB(Term_sub(m, s), t) → TERM_SUB(m, Concat(s, t))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(Sum_term_var(x₁)) = 7/2 + (11/4)x_1
POL(Term_sub(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + x_1
POL(Left) = 13/4
POL(Term_inr(x₁)) = 1/4 + (11/4)x_1
POL(Concat(x₁, x₂)) = 4
POL(Id) = 1/4
POL(Term_pair(x₁, x₂)) = 4 + (1/4)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(Sum_sub(x₁, x₂)) = 3/2 + (9/4)x_1
POL(Frozen(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄)) = 5/4 + (5/2)x_1 + (5/2)x_2 + (3/4)x_3 + (2)x_4
POL(Term_app(x₁, x₂)) = 13/4 + (7/4)x_1
POL(Term_inl(x₁)) = 4 + (5/4)x_1
POL(TERM_SUB(x₁, x₂)) = x_1
POL(Right) = 9/4
POL(Cons_sum(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 2 + (5/2)x_1 + (11/4)x_2 + (3)x_3
POL(Term_var(x₁)) = 7/2 + (13/4)x_1
POL(Cons_usual(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 4 + (5/2)x_1 + (7/2)x_2 + (3/4)x_3
POL(Sum_constant(x₁)) = 5/4 + (13/4)x_1
POL(Case(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 15/4 + (5/2)x_1 + (11/4)x_2 + (15/4)x_3

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 2.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ PisEmptyProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Term_sub(Case(m, xi, n), s) → Frozen(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → Term_sub(m, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → Term_sub(n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → Case(Term_sub(m, s), xi, Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_app(m, n), s) → Term_app(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_pair(m, n), s) → Term_pair(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_inl(m), s) → Term_inl(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_inr(m), s) → Term_inr(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Id) → Term_var(x)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → m
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_sub(m, s), t) → Term_sub(m, Concat(s, t))
Sum_sub(xi, Id) → Sum_term_var(xi)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_constant(k)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Concat(Concat(s, t), u) → Concat(s, Concat(t, u))
Concat(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → Cons_usual(x, Term_sub(m, t), Concat(s, t))
Concat(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → Cons_sum(xi, k, Concat(s, t))
Concat(Id, s) → s

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.